News

Center of the American Experiment
March 25, 2010

In recent years, PolyMet Mining and other companies have been exploring for non-ferrous (non-iron) minerals on the Iron Range. PolyMet is the closest to beginning extraction on a commercial, rather than just exploratory, basis.

Consequently, while environmental extremist special interests have been vocal in opposition even to exploration in pursuit of new mining opportunities, they have taken an especially hysterical and fear-mongering tone in trying to thwart PolyMet's efforts.

Like U.S. Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken, U.S. Rep. James Oberstar, and Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Center of the American Experiment has taken a commonsense conservationist approach to the issue of nonferrous mining in Minnesota.

PolyMet will provide a domestic supply of metals that Americans use every day-nickel, copper, gold, platinum, and palladium-in cell phones, computers, catalytic converters, electric cars, wind turbines, and medical devices. The global environmental and domestic economic impact of producing these critical metals here, and having to import less from elsewhere, will be very positive.

After all, avoiding mining in Minnesota won't reduce American or global demand. By mining here in Minnesota, we can ensure control of the operations and responsible stewardship.  This is an holistic approach to the global environment that stands in contrast to that of the environmental extremists, who often pretend to think globally but actually act selfishly.

PolyMet's operation in Minnesota stands to be a model for the world. It would be the epitome of good stewardship envisioned by our nation's great progressive conservationist forebears, like Teddy Roosevelt, who fought for the establishment of the national forest system for just such wise-use applications as this.

Center of the American Experiment has submitted comments to the State in support of the PolyMet proposal and has authored op-eds in the Star Tribune and elsewhere.